tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8180764321069319458.post5199316703822336233..comments2024-01-07T07:40:29.133-05:00Comments on The WMRA Blog: The Supremes at work . . .Most of Martha Woodroof in one placehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14628461346931946238noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8180764321069319458.post-62543285286140198662009-09-07T21:10:42.576-04:002009-09-07T21:10:42.576-04:00Yes, the movie is entertainment and is, in some se...Yes, the movie is entertainment and is, in some sense, protected free speech, but come on -- the timing of it and its partisan content was so obviously political campaigning, I just can't understand how an argument can be squeezed out of the case to threaten solid, common sense legal precedent regarding campaign finance law. The questions of free speech and freedom of association have already been addressed. Roberts is not respectful of precedent. He is radical and frightening.dogwooddiaristhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14620645607630640331noreply@blogger.com